Unbiased Reporting

What I post on this Blog does not mean I agree with the articles or disagree. I call it Unbiased Reporting!

Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly

Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Awesome Video! Israeli Soldiers Dancing ft. Kesha - TICK TOCK (Rock the Casba in Hebron)



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1292432/Israeli-soldiers-captured-YouTube-doing-West-Bank-shuffle.html

Nashua, NH DCYF Kidnap Undamaged Children-Their Worth More Money!


I have recently come to a conclusion on the reasoning behind DCYF's kidnapping of non-abused, non-neglected, un-damaged Nashua area children, while abused and neglected children are left suffering in their homes.
There are MANY Nashua mother's who have given birth to drug addicted babies and are NOT reported to Nashua DCYF by their cohort hospital. If they are reported, the DCYF worker will ask the mother if she still plans on using illegal drugs. Of course the mother say's NO and the case is dropped. Mother's who smoke crack, shoot heroin and whatever else while their pregnant, still have their children. This proves to me that DCYF only goes after the un-damaged children. The children of mother's who went into methadone treatment, to make sure their baby was born healthy. The baby's were born healthy and these are the baby's kidnapped by DCYF. The babies who didn't suffer brain damage, low birth weight or any of the other complications suffered by newborn babies of drug addicted mother's. Babies whose lives will be hell. Babies whose lives may be cut short due to the drug abuse of their mother's.
The healthy babies are the ones DCYF can make more money off of. The State won't have to provide lifetime services for these children, as they would have to for drug addicted children. Drug addicted children are too hard to place.
I've spoken to mother's whose newborn babies have been kidnapped, after being in the methadone program for pregnant women. They are sorry they went into the methadone program, after seeing all the drug addicted mother's who still have their children. Their damaged children! They've told me they never should have gone into the methadone program and they wouldn't have lost their child. These mother's trusted the staff of the methadone program. They trusted the people who CAN NOT be trusted. I guess the corruption is everywhere. Mother's to be can only trust their family. Not outsider's, who say they are there to help. They are only there to help themselves, making money off newborn babies. Drug addicted mother's would be better off staying away from any methadone programs. They are pushed into it after refusing abortion and told by the Counselor that their baby will die if they don't take the methadone. What a crock! Methadone withdrawl is much worse than heroin withdrawl. So if you want to keep your baby, get off drugs and stay away from any methadone program.
I've also noticed how DCYF kidnap's older children with no behavior problems or violent behavior. When these children fight back, they are automatically given a label. First the parent is told their drugged for their new-found violent behavior. Once the child get's a little older and placement becomes nearly impossible, except that is to the child's own family who is NOT allowed custody because DCYF will lose money, the child is given a new label and fed more drugs, without consent of his parents, yet rights have NOT been terminated. Consent by the parent doesn't matter any way, because the NH Judges will sign the order whether the parent likes it or not. Parent's have NO say in the NH Court's. Ask any DCYF worker. They laugh in your face and tell you NH Judges have NO SAY! And they don't! DCYF get's whatever they want.
In the Nashua area, white children are in high demand. If the baby look's white at birth, but is actually half Spanish, the caseworker tells the mother not to tell anyone. Is it true white children are worth more money to DCYF? Sick, putting a price tag on a child!
If an older child is half Spanish, which anyone can clearly see and the child is older, say six year's old, he has two thing's against him. His nationality and his age. This child is automatically given a label and fed drug's. Now he's worth more to DCYF and has a better chance of being placed with foster stranger's as they get more money for this child and even more money if they adopt him. My grandson Austin was kidnapped at age six and placed in a foster home, tried to hang himself due to the loss of his family, then placed in a childrens home, sixty miles away and sat their until he was almost ten, before DCYF could finally place him with an adoptive family.
Many foster stranger's went to meet him at the childrens home, but no-one could handle him. An angry little boy, traumatized by DCYF. He was on display like a puppy in a pet store. We fought for him since he was kidnapped and are still fighting for him. We want him regardless of any problems he has due to DCYF. But Nashua DCYF does NOT consider grandparent's or other relatives. They would lose money if he were placed with family. When you are finally considered for placement, the Nashua Supervisor falsifies paperwork and the child's family is allowed a half-assed home study. DCYF claims the relatives were given a home study to show them why they can't have custody, yet e-mails sent by Concord DCYF show the home study is being given for placement. How corrupt is this? DCYF, CASA, Austin's psychologist, the head of the childrens home and the court's are well aware of what Austin want's. Everyone testified in court Austin want's to be with us, but since when does anyone work toward the best interest's of a child? We did nothing wrong. Austin was first placed with us by the Nashua PD. Staying with us was a court ordered placement, against the wishes of DCYF's 2nd lying Lawyer, who had the Judge sign a motion to modify fourteen day's later, stating Austin's Aunt couldn't be around him. This was after the same Judge okayed his placement, knowing his Aunt lived with us. We were given fifteen minutes to comply with the motion. Just enough time for me to get home.
Austin will never forget the nightmare he went through that day. He will never trust. Especially not DCYF and probably not the Police, as they were ones who dragged him out of the house kicking and screaming. Now my whole neighborhood knows how corrupt DCYF is. The rest of you had better wake up to this corruption. Your children could be next!

unhappygrammy

Pfizer Accused of Experimenting on Kids

Pfizer Accused of Experimenting on Kids
posted by: Jessica Pieklo 12 hours ago


The Supreme Court gave a rare hit to private businesses when it declined to take up a case against pharmaceutical giant Pfizer. The suit alleges the drug company conducted nonconsensual drug testing on over 200 Nigerian children, some of whom died as a result of the tests. The suit was filed under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) which grants federal judges the ability to hear civil lawsuits filed by non-US citizens for violations of the "law of nations". By declining to hear Pfizer's appeal and entertain its argument that it cannot be sued in an American court for these claims the Supreme Court has allowed the matter to move forward to trial.

According to the complaint, in 2006 Pfizer employees, working with Nigerian officials, recruited 200 sick children during a viral outbreak in Kano, Nigeria in order to test a new product. Half of the children recruited were given Trovan, an experimental drug never tested on children. The other half of the recruits received a Food and Drug Administration-approved antibiotic.

While Trovan had never before been tested on children, it had been tested on animals, and those clinical trials showed the drug had life-threatening side effects. But according to the complaint, Pfizer never advised the children or their guardians about those lethal side-effects, nor did Pfizer ever advise the recruits that the relief group Doctors Without Borders was providing a "conventional and effective treatment" for the virus, free of charge, at the very same hospital.

Plaintiffs of the suit are surviving children of the drug experiments and relatives of the children who died. The children who survived the experiments were left deaf, blind, paralyzed, or brain damaged. Normally such claims would be filed in Nigeria, the location of the drug experiments, but attorneys for the plaintiffs argue that Nigerian courts are too corrupt and only the American court system can adequately bring Pfizer to justice. Pfizer has denied that the Nigeria experiments were conducted without the consent and knowledge of the children and their guardians and want the case thrown out of court because, according to Pfizer, the drug experiments are not a specific violation of international law and thus not covered under the Alien Tort Statute.

And Pfizer is fighting this case hard, arguing that the Alien Tort Statute should not be read to allow these kinds of claims. Pfizer's issued statement claims that suits like these are in reality a discriminatory tax on American companies who do business abroad.

But the lawyers for the Nigerian children see it a little differently, arguing that multinational corporations should not get to hide behind jurisdictional arguments if they prey on the vulnerable. Quite simply, Pfizer wasn't engaged in any legitimate international commerce during these experiments, so to call ATS suits a "tax" on business is really something else.

Shortly after the US suit was filed Nigerian officials filed their own lawsuit which Pfizer agreed to settle last year. In that case Pfizer announced it would pay a $75 million settlement in exchange for the dismissal of all civil and criminal charges filed in Nigeria. The settlement purportedly also establishes a fund to benefit the children involved in the drug experiments.

It's doubtful that Pfizer would have engaged in similar behavior in the United States, and the positioning by the Supreme Court means a settlement is just as likely as a trial as Pfizer will want to keep as much of these events out of the mainstream American press as possible. But it does serve as an important marker for those trying to protect the most vulnerable from what seems like never-ending abuses from the private sector.
Read more: nigeria, politics, pfizer, drug experiments

http://www.care2.com/causes/politics/blog/pfizer-accused-of-experimenting-on-kids/

The CPS Juvenile Family Court Criminal Network Pt1/2 - Lawyers, Judges, Activists Speak



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1O8nqH1mmaI&feature=related

The CPS Juvenile Family Court Criminal Network Pt2/2 - Lawyers, Judges, Activists Speak



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oxcsLfekgM

Monday, July 5, 2010

Baby LK Report For July 4th 2010



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0ryirXC1rc&feature=player_embedded#!

Saratoga County approved contract with arrested psychologist because his rates were the cheapest

Saratoga County approved contract with arrested psychologist because his rates were the cheapest
June 6, 7:21 AM Albany CPS and Family Court Examiner Daniel Weaver


According to the September 8, 2009 minutes of the Saratoga County Public Safety Committee, Dr. Steven B. Feldman, who was arrested Friday for having phony credentials, was hired to do work for the county because his rates were the least expensive. The county hired Feldman to do psychological evaluations for the Saratoga County Family Court. Two other psychologists under contract to the county were rarely utilized, regardless of their credentials or expertise, because their rates were higher. Even Feldman, however, exceeded his contract amount of $10,000.
Saratoga County Public Defender, John Ciulla, testified at the meeting.
The minutes stated that:
"Mr. Ciulla said last year, their $10,000 contract with Dr. Feldman was used up before the end of the year. In keeping what has been going on in Family Court, we have used the money up already, he said. We are proposing instead of doing a limited contract, we will do a general contract with him, he said. He said they currently have three psychologists under contract to provide evaluations, and he asked them to update their current fees. Dr. Feldman is the least expensive and the preferred choice, he said. To prevent me coming back here year after year to expand this contract, it was suggested we just have a regular contract, he stated. Mr. Hellwig said the rates will dictate the cost. As long as he does not go above the rate for the evaluations, it will be indefinite, he said. For a higher rate, he will have to come back, he added. Mr. Rider said the Board approves the contract at a certain rate, and the budget will set how much money he has to spend each year. If the Dr. wants more money, the Board will have to approve that. Mr. Ciulla said he does have minor contracts with two other vendors, but their prices are more, and that is why we prefer to use Dr. Feldman. Mr. Grattidge moved to authorize an on-going contract with Dr. Feldman. Mr. Wright seconded. Unanimous." (emphasis added)
In the Proceedings of the Saratoga County Board of Supervisors of January 20, 2009, the following resolution was passed requesting an additional $875 to pay Feldman.
"RESOLUTION 25 - 09
Introduced by Supervisors Wormuth, Barrett, Connelly, Grattidge, Jenkins, Rowland and Wright
AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO MINOR CONTRACT WITH STEVEN B. FELDMAN, PSYD, PHD,
DAPA, LMHC FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICE WHEREAS, Article 18B of the County Law requires counties to supply counsel, investigators, expert and other services to persons charged with a crime who are financially unable to obtain these services; and WHEREAS, our Public Defender from time to time requires psychological services to assist in the defense of persons represented by that office who are financially unable to obtain these services; and WHEREAS, the County has a contract with Steven B. Feldman, PSYD, PHD, DAPA, LMHC to provide psychological services to indigent defendants represented by the Public Defender’s Office, not to exceed $10,000; and WHEREAS, the cost of Dr. Feldman’s services in 2008 exceeded the authorized $10,000, and an amendment to his contract is required to authorize payment of an additional $875 for his services; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Chair of the Board is authorized to execute an Amendment to the Minor Contract with
Steven B. Feldman, PsyD, PhD, DAPA, LMHC, of Ballston Spa, New York to provide psychological services to the Public Defender on behalf of persons being represented by that office for a sum not to exceed an additional $875, the form and substance of said Agreement subject to approval of the County Attorney and the Contract Administrator.
BUDGET IMPACT STATEMENT: The additional $875 expense can be covered within the 2008 budget."
Feldman is not a licensed psychologist in New York State but is a licensed mental health counselor. It is not clear how the New York State Office of the Professions issued Feldman a license to be a mental health counselor as an appropriate advanced degree is required for licensing in New York State.
For more info:
Read about the arrest of Steven B. Feldman.
Read about Saratoga County Family Court Judge, Gilbert Abramson.

http://www.examiner.com/x-14537-Albany-CPS-and-Family-Court-Examiner~y2010m6d6-Saratoga-County-approved-contract-with-arrested-psychologist-because-his-rates-were-the-cheapest?cid=examiner-email