Study Presented on Autism and Vaccines Using Cells From Babies From Abortion
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
June 3, 2010
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- A controversial study into the possible link between the use of cells form babies victimized by abortions in vaccines and an increase in autism rates was presented late last month to the International Meeting for Autism Research in Philadelphia.
Dr. Theresa Deisher, the founder and lead scientist of the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (SCPI), which conducted the study, presented the paper touching on the apparent link found in childhood immunizations with Autism and Austim Spectrum Disorder.
The study, which Deisher said was "met with both shock and gratitude," focused on "improper integration of the residual DNA as a possible contributor to autism, particularly in genetically susceptible infants."
"It is known from gene therapy studies that injected naked DNA can be transported to the brain, that improperly integrated therapeutic DNA has caused cancer in young children, and that shorter DNA fragments have a higher probability of entering the nucleus," Deisher said.
Deisher, along with physicist Marissa LaMadrid, PhD, authored the paper investigating whether improper insertion of DNA into the vaccine recipient cells can cause autism.
"Changepoint analysis of autism disorder demonstrates a temporal correlation with events associated with human DNA residuals in vaccines. The levels of residual DNA are well over FDA-recommended limits", stated Dr. Deisher.
While research has been conducted in the past on a possible link between thimerosal and autism, no one has ever looked at the contaminating DNA, something requested for years by Children of God for Life, a pro-life watchdog focused on the use of aborted fetal material in vaccines, medicines and other consumer products.
"Until the advent of AVM Biotechnology and their non-profit arm SCPI we had little hope that anyone would invest the time and money to do this study", stated Children of God for Life's founder, Debi Vinnedge.
A separate study published by the Environmental Protection Agency in February in the publication Environmental Science & Technology, confirms 1988 as a “change point” in the rise of Autism Disorder rate.
"Although the debate about the nature of increasing autism continues, the potential for this increase to be real and involve exogenous environmental stressors exists," the study says.
The 1988 date is significant because SCPI indicates that's when the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices added a second dose of the MMR vaccine, containing fetal cells from aborted babies, to its recommendations.
The study found two other change point dates: 1981, two years after MMRII was approved in the United States with fetal cells, and 1995, when SCPI says the chickenpox vaccine using aborted cells was approved.
Two pro-life advocates seized on that study and said it shows a correlation between the use of cells from babies in abortions in vaccines and an increase in autism rates.
But the study's author, Mike McDonald, and others, questioned that claim.
McDonald responded to an email from the Opposing Views web site, and said the claims "incorrectly represent, and far overreach, our study findings."
And Rev. Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco, an Assistant Professor of Biology at Providence College, told LifeNews.com the study "suggests a link between exogenous environmental stressors and autism" but "does not say that this stressor was the vaccine."
http://www.lifenews.com/nat6392.html
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
Friday, June 4, 2010
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Federal Judge Orders Atlanta Child Welfare System to Hand Over Documents on Foster Care Alternatives
25 MAY 2010 / POSTED BY CR
Children’s Rights is one step closer to shedding light on concerns that the Georgia Division of Family and Children Services (DFCS) may be misusing programs designed to support families in an attempt to artificially suppress child abuse and neglect investigations and reduce the number of children in its custody.
We filed papers in federal court two months ago seeking documents related to the state child welfare agency’s use of strategies aimed at avoiding child abuse and neglect investigations in certain cases and allowing parents to voluntarily place children with relatives or family friends while accessing community services or being investigated for abuse or neglect.
Citing multiple investigations conducted by the Georgia Office of the Child Advocate (OCA) over the last three years, we presented evidence that the state has been using these strategies inappropriately — and argued that if these allegations are true, DFCS’s actions are not only violating children’s constitutional rights and a longstanding federal court order secured by Children’s Rights to reform the Atlanta child welfare system, but also putting a great many kids at risk of serious harm.
Last Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Marvin H. Shoob agreed that “the OCA reports raise at least the possibility that diversion, safety resources, and temporary guardianships are being used in Fulton and DeKalb Counties to keep children out of foster care inappropriately.”
His decision (PDF) requires state officials to provide Children’s Rights with all policies, practices, and procedures related to diversion, safety plans, and temporary guardianships in Fulton and DeKalb counties — along with a list of all children who accessed these services in 2009 — within 10 days. Once the documents have been turned over, Children’s Rights can then select cases to be reviewed in depth to determine whether the child welfare agency is, in fact, putting children in danger.
Children’s Rights believes strongly that children should be able to remain with their families whenever it is safe and possible to do so. However, programs that “divert” child abuse reports must include the intensive services and oversight needed to help these families stay together and ensure that children are safe. Otherwise, these programs can be misused as a means to save state funds, deny families vital services and supports, and potentially keep vulnerable children in unsafe homes and at risk of being harmed again.
We remain committed to ensuring that children and families in Atlanta — and across the United States — are not being inappropriately shuffled away from the supports and services they need.
http://www.childrensrights.org/reform-campaigns/legal-cases//georgia-kenny-a-v-perdue/federal-judge-orders-atlanta-child-welfare-system-to-hand-over-documents-on-foster-care-alternatives/
Children’s Rights is one step closer to shedding light on concerns that the Georgia Division of Family and Children Services (DFCS) may be misusing programs designed to support families in an attempt to artificially suppress child abuse and neglect investigations and reduce the number of children in its custody.
We filed papers in federal court two months ago seeking documents related to the state child welfare agency’s use of strategies aimed at avoiding child abuse and neglect investigations in certain cases and allowing parents to voluntarily place children with relatives or family friends while accessing community services or being investigated for abuse or neglect.
Citing multiple investigations conducted by the Georgia Office of the Child Advocate (OCA) over the last three years, we presented evidence that the state has been using these strategies inappropriately — and argued that if these allegations are true, DFCS’s actions are not only violating children’s constitutional rights and a longstanding federal court order secured by Children’s Rights to reform the Atlanta child welfare system, but also putting a great many kids at risk of serious harm.
Last Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Marvin H. Shoob agreed that “the OCA reports raise at least the possibility that diversion, safety resources, and temporary guardianships are being used in Fulton and DeKalb Counties to keep children out of foster care inappropriately.”
His decision (PDF) requires state officials to provide Children’s Rights with all policies, practices, and procedures related to diversion, safety plans, and temporary guardianships in Fulton and DeKalb counties — along with a list of all children who accessed these services in 2009 — within 10 days. Once the documents have been turned over, Children’s Rights can then select cases to be reviewed in depth to determine whether the child welfare agency is, in fact, putting children in danger.
Children’s Rights believes strongly that children should be able to remain with their families whenever it is safe and possible to do so. However, programs that “divert” child abuse reports must include the intensive services and oversight needed to help these families stay together and ensure that children are safe. Otherwise, these programs can be misused as a means to save state funds, deny families vital services and supports, and potentially keep vulnerable children in unsafe homes and at risk of being harmed again.
We remain committed to ensuring that children and families in Atlanta — and across the United States — are not being inappropriately shuffled away from the supports and services they need.
http://www.childrensrights.org/reform-campaigns/legal-cases//georgia-kenny-a-v-perdue/federal-judge-orders-atlanta-child-welfare-system-to-hand-over-documents-on-foster-care-alternatives/
Placement of Children With Relatives: Summary of State Laws
Placement of Children With Relatives: Summary of State Laws- (2008 PDF File) In order for States to receive Federal payments for foster care and adoption assistance, Federal law requires that they "consider giving preference to an adult relative over a non related caregiver when determining placement for a child, provided that the relative caregiver meets all relevant State child protection standards."
http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/placementall.pdf
http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/placementall.pdf
Adoptive parents of abused boy arrested
Adoptive parents of abused boy arrested
Reported by: KMTR.com Staff
Last Update: 8:40 am
Eugene (KMTR) - A Lane County couple is in jail, accused of abusing a foster child they took in more than four years ago, and later adopted.
Rodger and Alona Hartwig are charged with assault and criminal mistreatment of their adopted nine-year-old son.
The Oregon Department of Human Services says the boy has been released from a Portland hospital and placed with a different foster family.
Sheriff’s investigators say the victim first joined the Hartwig family as a foster child when he was four, and was later adopted. The couple also adopted the boy's two siblings.
In March, the Hartwigs took the boy to Sacred Heart Medical Center at RiverBend in Springfield, where doctors found several fractures to the boy’s ribs, fingers, vertebrae and pelvic bones in addition to a severe, untreated third-degree burn on his foot, according to the investigators.
The boy was later taken to a children's hospital in Portland.
Sheriff’s Lieutenant Byron Trapp said, “There is some indication on the medical analysis that they are varying ages of injuries. Some are very acute, fresh, injuries and some do show some indication of healing.”
In all, the Hartwigs had six children in their care; four adopted and two biological. All the children are between the ages of 9 and 13 years. All are now in foster care.
The Lane County Sheriff’s Office could not comment on whether any of the other children had suffered abuse, but that is something they are looking into.
The nine-year-old boy attended public school and was also home-schooled.
http://www.kmtr.com/news/local/story/Adoptive-parents-of-abused-boy-arrested/5w8VYiSFgkCOph49W3rCww.cspx
Reported by: KMTR.com Staff
Last Update: 8:40 am
Eugene (KMTR) - A Lane County couple is in jail, accused of abusing a foster child they took in more than four years ago, and later adopted.
Rodger and Alona Hartwig are charged with assault and criminal mistreatment of their adopted nine-year-old son.
The Oregon Department of Human Services says the boy has been released from a Portland hospital and placed with a different foster family.
Sheriff’s investigators say the victim first joined the Hartwig family as a foster child when he was four, and was later adopted. The couple also adopted the boy's two siblings.
In March, the Hartwigs took the boy to Sacred Heart Medical Center at RiverBend in Springfield, where doctors found several fractures to the boy’s ribs, fingers, vertebrae and pelvic bones in addition to a severe, untreated third-degree burn on his foot, according to the investigators.
The boy was later taken to a children's hospital in Portland.
Sheriff’s Lieutenant Byron Trapp said, “There is some indication on the medical analysis that they are varying ages of injuries. Some are very acute, fresh, injuries and some do show some indication of healing.”
In all, the Hartwigs had six children in their care; four adopted and two biological. All the children are between the ages of 9 and 13 years. All are now in foster care.
The Lane County Sheriff’s Office could not comment on whether any of the other children had suffered abuse, but that is something they are looking into.
The nine-year-old boy attended public school and was also home-schooled.
http://www.kmtr.com/news/local/story/Adoptive-parents-of-abused-boy-arrested/5w8VYiSFgkCOph49W3rCww.cspx
N.H. Families Request Audit of NH DHHS/DCYFNH DCYF Target:Petition for Audit of NH DCYF
petition overview | letter
N.H. Families Request Audit of NH DHHS/DCYFNH DCYF
Target:Petition for Audit of NH DCYF
Sponsored by: Dorothy Knightly and Hope Nardone and Pat Patterson
NH families are requesting an audit of NH DHHS/DCYF. A list of points has been put together by NH families to show how much an audit is duly warranted in this state.
1) thorough investigation of skillset/mindset/educational backgrounds/experience of the NH DCYF caseworkers, supervisors and subcontracted staff, to determine if NH DCYF staff (and subcontracted staff) are capable of the determinations that they make for children taken into NH DCYF custody and of the decisions regarding the families of those children
2) indepth investigation of the actions of NH DCYF caseworkers,supervisors, lawyers and subcontracted staff upon taking *children away from their families and placing the children* into "protective custody," and proof that the child in NH DCYF custody is kept safe and that all actions of NH DCYF are soley in the best interest of the child, instead of in the best interest of NH DCYF staff.
3) an in-depth investigation to study the damages that NH DCYF has caused to children and their families, resulting from NH DCYF allegations of parents and families of the children/youth in "protective custody"
3A) That a yearly clinical study needs to be done on each child that NH DCYF takes into custody and places outside of the family to assess the damage and trauma the child has suffered while in DCYF custody, until the child reaches 18 years of age (21 years of age for disabled children) or until DCYF returns the child to his/her family
4) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's failure to ensure continued proper assessment and medical/mental health treatment of the children in the system
5) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's failure to place children with relatives prior to placing children in foster homes
6) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions to abuse their authority within the NH judicial. legal, healthcare, medical and school system (this includes and is not limited to: stalling court ordered testing of a child in NH DCYF custody, stalling homestudies, stalling homestudy results and incomplete home studies in order to keep a child in NH DCYF custody, gaining further power via abusing exparte hearings to make false allegations against a parent/family of a child taken into NH DCYF custody, abusing their authority to access medical and healthcare records of a child (or of the child's family) prior to being taken into NH DCYF custody, NH DCYF caseworkers influencing healthcare and medical professionals in order to obtain a slanted 2nd opinion or what should have been a neutral professional opinion, NH DCYF abusing their power to cover up a child's special needs in order to create a false picture that the child is making progress while in NH DCYF custody when in fact the child is not making progress, delaying the child's IEP testing, etc ) and medicating foster children with psychiatric medication for violent behavior, without the parents consent. Behavior the child never experienced until taken from his/her family.
6A) an indepth investigation as to actions and influence of NH DYCF regarding the result/finding of homestudies and the decision/denial of homestudy appeals filed by families to the Administrative Appeals Unit
7) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions that failed to follow court orders. IE: court ordered visitation, acting within the timeframes as required by law for any and all actions and decisions regarding children in the system as well as the families of those children
8) an in-depth investigation to study allegations made by NH DCYF's staff to schools, medical professionals, health care professionals, relatives, etc about parents/families of children in NH DCYF custody
9) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's falsifying any type of document and withholding evidence that might be a contradiction of such NH DCYF false allegations and might clear the parent/family of the false allegations made by NH DCYF: This includes and is not limited to: falsifying information on birth certificates in order to promote adoption of a child in NH DCYF custody, false statements and manipulation of facts in order to take a child into NH DCYF custody, false statements in order to obtain social security monies, false statements in order to gain further federal or state monies and false statements to Judges without proof of allegations in order to remove a child from their parents.
10) an in-depth investigation to study how monies were obtained by NH DCYF from the families of the children in protective custody and an audit to the penny of all monies spent by NH DCYF/NH DHHS
11) an in-depth investigation to study the extent of NH DCYF's "double billing" to gain additional funding from the Government, from the State and from families of children in NH DCYF custody
12) an in-depth investigation for a complete audit that will include how every penny of foster care monies was spent on each child in NH DCYF custody
13) an in-depth investigation for determination of financial damages caused by NH
DCYF to the families of those children taken fraudalently by NH DCYF
14) an in-depth investigation for determination of physical, social, psychological, emotional damages caused to the children and to the families of children in NH DCYF custody
15) an in-depth investigation for determination of the extent that NH DCYF has alienated children from their families, including the extent that NH DCYF has alienated the parent from the child in NH DCYF custody
16) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions as abuse and neglect of children in NH DCYF's custody (IE: as those children were and are entitled to freedom to practice the same religion that they practiced prior to being taken into NH DCYF custody, children who were not considered to be placed with relatives instead of being placed into foster care, children who were denied the right to prompt IEP testing within the allotted timeframe from the moment that IEP testing was requested of NH DCYF in writing by the guardian or parent of the child in NH DCYF custody, prompt and proper evaluation and treatment of mental, physical and psychiatric illness of the children in NH DCYF custody, and an indepth review of the medications that were given to the children in NH DCYF custody with a full explanation as to the reason for each medication given, the right of the child to spend time with their family, the social and emotional and physical trauma or injury caused to the child as a direct result of the child being taken into NH DCYF custody: this includes and is not limited to: children placed in foster care or in other settings, any bruises, open skin areas, broken bones, fall/accidents, hospitalizations, broken teeth, signs/symptoms of anxiety or depression including suicide attempts of each and every child during the time that the child is in NH DCYF custody)
17) an indepth investigation to determine if NH DCYF has acted on behalf or in violation of our constitution
18) an indepth look at NH DCYF's actions to determine whether NH DCYF has followed or violated their own mission statement: including determination of how NH DCYF has "reunified families" in a timely manner and in the least traumatic way for the children, youth and families that they are supposed to be servicing
18A) an indepth investigation as to how many families have been reunified by NH DCYF within the last five years
18B) an indepth investigation as to how many parent's rights were terminated in NH within a five year period and how many TPR's(termination of parental rights) were filed by NH DCYF within that five year period
18C) an indepth investigation to determine if NH DCYF has violated federal law via the manner in which NH DCYF takes children into the system, via the manner in which NH DCYF gains further legal power through the use of exparte hearings, via tampering with documents, via falsifying documents, illegally gaining access to information such as medical and health information without full consent and full knowledge of the child's parent/guardian during the time that NH DCYF doesn't have full custody, via stalling documents and testing in order to stall for time within the legal system in order to keep a child in NH DCYF custody
19) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions to determine what extent NH DCYF has acted outside of the scope of their usual practice or their Administrative Rules (IE: slandering any families of children in the system, practicing medicine without a license, stalking families, delaying testing/evaluations of the children in NH DCYF custody, tampering/manipulating evidence and truths in order to obtain physical custody of a child, denial of family homestudies of children in NH DCYF custody in order to keep the child in foster care instead of relative placement, tampering with birth certificates as a means to adopt a child to different family, terminating parental rights without just cause, denying families their parental rights when the parental rights have not been terminated, dating family members/having romantic relationships with families of children in the system, and forceful separations of married couples, and other unethical and inappropriate behaviors
20) an indepth investigation as to financial costs to the people of NH for each NH DCYF allegation (which includes and is not limited to, court costs, transportation costs) and to the financial gains that NH DCYF/NH DHHS makes for each child that they take into NH DCYF custody.
21) An indepth investigation of DCYF files showing services given to at-risk families before the removal of a child
21A) What pertains to imminent danger and how many children have been removed from their families in the last five years for anticipated "Neglect in the Future"
22) an indepth investigation as to the amount of federal money being paid to DCYF for the removal for each child compared to the amount of money paid for each family kept together
And request that there be specific requirements for NH DCYF caseworkers and staff who directly work with children in NH DCYF custody and their families (to include parent aids) as there are for doctors, nurses, health aids.
These specific requirements are to include a professional conduct code for each level of staff, specific levels of education for each level of staff (including ongoing training to work with children youth and families), professional licensure codes and professional and licensure accountability of biased or falsified information for all NH DCYF staff and all NH DCYF subcontracted staff who have direct or indirect contact/work with the children in NH DCYF custody or their families (this would include parent aids also).
Request that NH DCYF be made to correct their wrongdoings, return children promptly to the family as soon as there is evidence that contradicts the allegations made by NH DCYF staff, that NH DCYF be required to financially compensate each child/youth/family whom NH DCYF has traumatized, injured, abused, neglected, slandered. NH DCYF must be required to compensate each parent for the loss of job, loss of home, all physical and emotional insults and injuries caused by NH DCYF staff for practicing outside of the scope of their practice, for obtaining privately protected health and medical information without the consent of the child's parent/guardian, for each false statement made about a family member, for each failure to keep the child in safe environment that is most appropriate for the child's needs, financial compensation for failure to ensure that a child in NH DCYF custody be allowed their Constitutional rights, financial compensation for failure to promptly assess, and ensure appropriate diagnosis and treatment of a child in NH DCYF custody.
NH families are requesting an audit of NH DHHS/DCYF. A list of points has been put together by NH families to show how much an audit is duly warranted in this state.
1) thorough investigation of skillset/mindset/educational backgrounds/experience of the NH DCYF caseworkers, supervisors and subcontracted staff, to determine if NH DCYF staff (and subcontracted staff) are capable of the determinations that they make for children taken into NH DCYF custody and of the decisions regarding the families of those children
2) indepth investigation of the actions of NH DCYF caseworkers,supervisors, lawyers and subcontracted staff upon taking *children away from their families and placing the children* into "protective custody," and proof that the child in NH DCYF custody is kept safe and that all actions of NH DCYF are soley in the best interest of the child, instead of in the best interest of NH DCYF staff.
3) an in-depth investigation to study the damages that NH DCYF has caused to children and their families, resulting from NH DCYF allegations of parents and families of the children/youth in "protective custody"
3A) That a yearly clinical study needs to be done on each child that NH DCYF takes into custody and places outside of the family to assess the damage and trauma the child has suffered while in DCYF custody, until the child reaches 18 years of age (21 years of age for disabled children) or until DCYF returns the child to his/her family
4) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's failure to ensure continued proper assessment and medical/mental health treatment of the children in the system
5) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's failure to place children with relatives prior to placing children in foster homes
6) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions to abuse their authority within the NH judicial. legal, healthcare, medical and school system (this includes and is not limited to: stalling court ordered testing of a child in NH DCYF custody, stalling homestudies, stalling homestudy results and incomplete home studies in order to keep a child in NH DCYF custody, gaining further power via abusing exparte hearings to make false allegations against a parent/family of a child taken into NH DCYF custody, abusing their authority to access medical and healthcare records of a child (or of the child's family) prior to being taken into NH DCYF custody, NH DCYF caseworkers influencing healthcare and medical professionals in order to obtain a slanted 2nd opinion or what should have been a neutral professional opinion, NH DCYF abusing their power to cover up a child's special needs in order to create a false picture that the child is making progress while in NH DCYF custody when in fact the child is not making progress, delaying the child's IEP testing, etc ) and medicating foster children with psychiatric medication for violent behavior, without the parents consent. Behavior the child never experienced until taken from his/her family.
6A) an indepth investigation as to actions and influence of NH DYCF regarding the result/finding of homestudies and the decision/denial of homestudy appeals filed by families to the Administrative Appeals Unit
7) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions that failed to follow court orders. IE: court ordered visitation, acting within the timeframes as required by law for any and all actions and decisions regarding children in the system as well as the families of those children
8) an in-depth investigation to study allegations made by NH DCYF's staff to schools, medical professionals, health care professionals, relatives, etc about parents/families of children in NH DCYF custody
9) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's falsifying any type of document and withholding evidence that might be a contradiction of such NH DCYF false allegations and might clear the parent/family of the false allegations made by NH DCYF: This includes and is not limited to: falsifying information on birth certificates in order to promote adoption of a child in NH DCYF custody, false statements and manipulation of facts in order to take a child into NH DCYF custody, false statements in order to obtain social security monies, false statements in order to gain further federal or state monies and false statements to Judges without proof of allegations in order to remove a child from their parents.
10) an in-depth investigation to study how monies were obtained by NH DCYF from the families of the children in protective custody and an audit to the penny of all monies spent by NH DCYF/NH DHHS
11) an in-depth investigation to study the extent of NH DCYF's "double billing" to gain additional funding from the Government, from the State and from families of children in NH DCYF custody
12) an in-depth investigation for a complete audit that will include how every penny of foster care monies was spent on each child in NH DCYF custody
13) an in-depth investigation for determination of financial damages caused by NH
DCYF to the families of those children taken fraudalently by NH DCYF
14) an in-depth investigation for determination of physical, social, psychological, emotional damages caused to the children and to the families of children in NH DCYF custody
15) an in-depth investigation for determination of the extent that NH DCYF has alienated children from their families, including the extent that NH DCYF has alienated the parent from the child in NH DCYF custody
16) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions as abuse and neglect of children in NH DCYF's custody (IE: as those children were and are entitled to freedom to practice the same religion that they practiced prior to being taken into NH DCYF custody, children who were not considered to be placed with relatives instead of being placed into foster care, children who were denied the right to prompt IEP testing within the allotted timeframe from the moment that IEP testing was requested of NH DCYF in writing by the guardian or parent of the child in NH DCYF custody, prompt and proper evaluation and treatment of mental, physical and psychiatric illness of the children in NH DCYF custody, and an indepth review of the medications that were given to the children in NH DCYF custody with a full explanation as to the reason for each medication given, the right of the child to spend time with their family, the social and emotional and physical trauma or injury caused to the child as a direct result of the child being taken into NH DCYF custody: this includes and is not limited to: children placed in foster care or in other settings, any bruises, open skin areas, broken bones, fall/accidents, hospitalizations, broken teeth, signs/symptoms of anxiety or depression including suicide attempts of each and every child during the time that the child is in NH DCYF custody)
17) an indepth investigation to determine if NH DCYF has acted on behalf or in violation of our constitution
18) an indepth look at NH DCYF's actions to determine whether NH DCYF has followed or violated their own mission statement: including determination of how NH DCYF has "reunified families" in a timely manner and in the least traumatic way for the children, youth and families that they are supposed to be servicing
18A) an indepth investigation as to how many families have been reunified by NH DCYF within the last five years
18B) an indepth investigation as to how many parent's rights were terminated in NH within a five year period and how many TPR's(termination of parental rights) were filed by NH DCYF within that five year period
18C) an indepth investigation to determine if NH DCYF has violated federal law via the manner in which NH DCYF takes children into the system, via the manner in which NH DCYF gains further legal power through the use of exparte hearings, via tampering with documents, via falsifying documents, illegally gaining access to information such as medical and health information without full consent and full knowledge of the child's parent/guardian during the time that NH DCYF doesn't have full custody, via stalling documents and testing in order to stall for time within the legal system in order to keep a child in NH DCYF custody
19) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions to determine what extent NH DCYF has acted outside of the scope of their usual practice or their Administrative Rules (IE: slandering any families of children in the system, practicing medicine without a license, stalking families, delaying testing/evaluations of the children in NH DCYF custody, tampering/manipulating evidence and truths in order to obtain physical custody of a child, denial of family homestudies of children in NH DCYF custody in order to keep the child in foster care instead of relative placement, tampering with birth certificates as a means to adopt a child to different family, terminating parental rights without just cause, denying families their parental rights when the parental rights have not been terminated, dating family members/having romantic relationships with families of children in the system, and forceful separations of married couples, and other unethical and inappropriate behaviors
20) an indepth investigation as to financial costs to the people of NH for each NH DCYF allegation (which includes and is not limited to, court costs, transportation costs) and to the financial gains that NH DCYF/NH DHHS makes for each child that they take into NH DCYF custody.
21) An indepth investigation of DCYF files showing services given to at-risk families before the removal of a child
21A) What pertains to imminent danger and how many children have been removed from their families in the last five years for anticipated "Neglect in the Future"
22) an indepth investigation as to the amount of federal money being paid to DCYF for the removal for each child compared to the amount of money paid for each family kept together
And request that there be specific requirements for NH DCYF caseworkers and staff who directly work with children in NH DCYF custody and their families (to include parent aids) as there are for doctors, nurses, health aids.
These specific requirements are to include a professional conduct code for each level of staff, specific levels of education for each level of staff (including ongoing training to work with children youth and families), professional licensure codes and professional and licensure accountability of biased or falsified information for all NH DCYF staff and all NH DCYF subcontracted staff who have direct or indirect contact/work with the children in NH DCYF custody or their families (this would include parent aids also).
Request that NH DCYF be made to correct their wrongdoings, return children promptly to the family as soon as there is evidence that contradicts the allegations made by NH DCYF staff, that NH DCYF be required to financially compensate each child/youth/family whom NH DCYF has traumatized, injured, abused, neglected, slandered. NH DCYF must be required to compensate each parent for the loss of job, loss of home, all physical and emotional insults and injuries caused by NH DCYF staff for practicing outside of the scope of their practice, for obtaining privately protected health and medical information without the consent of the child's parent/guardian, for each false statement made about a family member, for each failure to keep the child in safe environment that is most appropriate for the child's needs, financial compensation for failure to ensure that a child in NH DCYF custody be allowed their Constitutional rights, financial compensation for failure to promptly assess, and ensure appropriate diagnosis and treatment of a child in NH DCYF custody.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/nh-families-request-audit-of-nh-dhhsdcyfnh-dcyf
N.H. Families Request Audit of NH DHHS/DCYFNH DCYF
Target:Petition for Audit of NH DCYF
Sponsored by: Dorothy Knightly and Hope Nardone and Pat Patterson
NH families are requesting an audit of NH DHHS/DCYF. A list of points has been put together by NH families to show how much an audit is duly warranted in this state.
1) thorough investigation of skillset/mindset/educational backgrounds/experience of the NH DCYF caseworkers, supervisors and subcontracted staff, to determine if NH DCYF staff (and subcontracted staff) are capable of the determinations that they make for children taken into NH DCYF custody and of the decisions regarding the families of those children
2) indepth investigation of the actions of NH DCYF caseworkers,supervisors, lawyers and subcontracted staff upon taking *children away from their families and placing the children* into "protective custody," and proof that the child in NH DCYF custody is kept safe and that all actions of NH DCYF are soley in the best interest of the child, instead of in the best interest of NH DCYF staff.
3) an in-depth investigation to study the damages that NH DCYF has caused to children and their families, resulting from NH DCYF allegations of parents and families of the children/youth in "protective custody"
3A) That a yearly clinical study needs to be done on each child that NH DCYF takes into custody and places outside of the family to assess the damage and trauma the child has suffered while in DCYF custody, until the child reaches 18 years of age (21 years of age for disabled children) or until DCYF returns the child to his/her family
4) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's failure to ensure continued proper assessment and medical/mental health treatment of the children in the system
5) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's failure to place children with relatives prior to placing children in foster homes
6) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions to abuse their authority within the NH judicial. legal, healthcare, medical and school system (this includes and is not limited to: stalling court ordered testing of a child in NH DCYF custody, stalling homestudies, stalling homestudy results and incomplete home studies in order to keep a child in NH DCYF custody, gaining further power via abusing exparte hearings to make false allegations against a parent/family of a child taken into NH DCYF custody, abusing their authority to access medical and healthcare records of a child (or of the child's family) prior to being taken into NH DCYF custody, NH DCYF caseworkers influencing healthcare and medical professionals in order to obtain a slanted 2nd opinion or what should have been a neutral professional opinion, NH DCYF abusing their power to cover up a child's special needs in order to create a false picture that the child is making progress while in NH DCYF custody when in fact the child is not making progress, delaying the child's IEP testing, etc ) and medicating foster children with psychiatric medication for violent behavior, without the parents consent. Behavior the child never experienced until taken from his/her family.
6A) an indepth investigation as to actions and influence of NH DYCF regarding the result/finding of homestudies and the decision/denial of homestudy appeals filed by families to the Administrative Appeals Unit
7) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions that failed to follow court orders. IE: court ordered visitation, acting within the timeframes as required by law for any and all actions and decisions regarding children in the system as well as the families of those children
8) an in-depth investigation to study allegations made by NH DCYF's staff to schools, medical professionals, health care professionals, relatives, etc about parents/families of children in NH DCYF custody
9) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's falsifying any type of document and withholding evidence that might be a contradiction of such NH DCYF false allegations and might clear the parent/family of the false allegations made by NH DCYF: This includes and is not limited to: falsifying information on birth certificates in order to promote adoption of a child in NH DCYF custody, false statements and manipulation of facts in order to take a child into NH DCYF custody, false statements in order to obtain social security monies, false statements in order to gain further federal or state monies and false statements to Judges without proof of allegations in order to remove a child from their parents.
10) an in-depth investigation to study how monies were obtained by NH DCYF from the families of the children in protective custody and an audit to the penny of all monies spent by NH DCYF/NH DHHS
11) an in-depth investigation to study the extent of NH DCYF's "double billing" to gain additional funding from the Government, from the State and from families of children in NH DCYF custody
12) an in-depth investigation for a complete audit that will include how every penny of foster care monies was spent on each child in NH DCYF custody
13) an in-depth investigation for determination of financial damages caused by NH
DCYF to the families of those children taken fraudalently by NH DCYF
14) an in-depth investigation for determination of physical, social, psychological, emotional damages caused to the children and to the families of children in NH DCYF custody
15) an in-depth investigation for determination of the extent that NH DCYF has alienated children from their families, including the extent that NH DCYF has alienated the parent from the child in NH DCYF custody
16) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions as abuse and neglect of children in NH DCYF's custody (IE: as those children were and are entitled to freedom to practice the same religion that they practiced prior to being taken into NH DCYF custody, children who were not considered to be placed with relatives instead of being placed into foster care, children who were denied the right to prompt IEP testing within the allotted timeframe from the moment that IEP testing was requested of NH DCYF in writing by the guardian or parent of the child in NH DCYF custody, prompt and proper evaluation and treatment of mental, physical and psychiatric illness of the children in NH DCYF custody, and an indepth review of the medications that were given to the children in NH DCYF custody with a full explanation as to the reason for each medication given, the right of the child to spend time with their family, the social and emotional and physical trauma or injury caused to the child as a direct result of the child being taken into NH DCYF custody: this includes and is not limited to: children placed in foster care or in other settings, any bruises, open skin areas, broken bones, fall/accidents, hospitalizations, broken teeth, signs/symptoms of anxiety or depression including suicide attempts of each and every child during the time that the child is in NH DCYF custody)
17) an indepth investigation to determine if NH DCYF has acted on behalf or in violation of our constitution
18) an indepth look at NH DCYF's actions to determine whether NH DCYF has followed or violated their own mission statement: including determination of how NH DCYF has "reunified families" in a timely manner and in the least traumatic way for the children, youth and families that they are supposed to be servicing
18A) an indepth investigation as to how many families have been reunified by NH DCYF within the last five years
18B) an indepth investigation as to how many parent's rights were terminated in NH within a five year period and how many TPR's(termination of parental rights) were filed by NH DCYF within that five year period
18C) an indepth investigation to determine if NH DCYF has violated federal law via the manner in which NH DCYF takes children into the system, via the manner in which NH DCYF gains further legal power through the use of exparte hearings, via tampering with documents, via falsifying documents, illegally gaining access to information such as medical and health information without full consent and full knowledge of the child's parent/guardian during the time that NH DCYF doesn't have full custody, via stalling documents and testing in order to stall for time within the legal system in order to keep a child in NH DCYF custody
19) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions to determine what extent NH DCYF has acted outside of the scope of their usual practice or their Administrative Rules (IE: slandering any families of children in the system, practicing medicine without a license, stalking families, delaying testing/evaluations of the children in NH DCYF custody, tampering/manipulating evidence and truths in order to obtain physical custody of a child, denial of family homestudies of children in NH DCYF custody in order to keep the child in foster care instead of relative placement, tampering with birth certificates as a means to adopt a child to different family, terminating parental rights without just cause, denying families their parental rights when the parental rights have not been terminated, dating family members/having romantic relationships with families of children in the system, and forceful separations of married couples, and other unethical and inappropriate behaviors
20) an indepth investigation as to financial costs to the people of NH for each NH DCYF allegation (which includes and is not limited to, court costs, transportation costs) and to the financial gains that NH DCYF/NH DHHS makes for each child that they take into NH DCYF custody.
21) An indepth investigation of DCYF files showing services given to at-risk families before the removal of a child
21A) What pertains to imminent danger and how many children have been removed from their families in the last five years for anticipated "Neglect in the Future"
22) an indepth investigation as to the amount of federal money being paid to DCYF for the removal for each child compared to the amount of money paid for each family kept together
And request that there be specific requirements for NH DCYF caseworkers and staff who directly work with children in NH DCYF custody and their families (to include parent aids) as there are for doctors, nurses, health aids.
These specific requirements are to include a professional conduct code for each level of staff, specific levels of education for each level of staff (including ongoing training to work with children youth and families), professional licensure codes and professional and licensure accountability of biased or falsified information for all NH DCYF staff and all NH DCYF subcontracted staff who have direct or indirect contact/work with the children in NH DCYF custody or their families (this would include parent aids also).
Request that NH DCYF be made to correct their wrongdoings, return children promptly to the family as soon as there is evidence that contradicts the allegations made by NH DCYF staff, that NH DCYF be required to financially compensate each child/youth/family whom NH DCYF has traumatized, injured, abused, neglected, slandered. NH DCYF must be required to compensate each parent for the loss of job, loss of home, all physical and emotional insults and injuries caused by NH DCYF staff for practicing outside of the scope of their practice, for obtaining privately protected health and medical information without the consent of the child's parent/guardian, for each false statement made about a family member, for each failure to keep the child in safe environment that is most appropriate for the child's needs, financial compensation for failure to ensure that a child in NH DCYF custody be allowed their Constitutional rights, financial compensation for failure to promptly assess, and ensure appropriate diagnosis and treatment of a child in NH DCYF custody.
NH families are requesting an audit of NH DHHS/DCYF. A list of points has been put together by NH families to show how much an audit is duly warranted in this state.
1) thorough investigation of skillset/mindset/educational backgrounds/experience of the NH DCYF caseworkers, supervisors and subcontracted staff, to determine if NH DCYF staff (and subcontracted staff) are capable of the determinations that they make for children taken into NH DCYF custody and of the decisions regarding the families of those children
2) indepth investigation of the actions of NH DCYF caseworkers,supervisors, lawyers and subcontracted staff upon taking *children away from their families and placing the children* into "protective custody," and proof that the child in NH DCYF custody is kept safe and that all actions of NH DCYF are soley in the best interest of the child, instead of in the best interest of NH DCYF staff.
3) an in-depth investigation to study the damages that NH DCYF has caused to children and their families, resulting from NH DCYF allegations of parents and families of the children/youth in "protective custody"
3A) That a yearly clinical study needs to be done on each child that NH DCYF takes into custody and places outside of the family to assess the damage and trauma the child has suffered while in DCYF custody, until the child reaches 18 years of age (21 years of age for disabled children) or until DCYF returns the child to his/her family
4) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's failure to ensure continued proper assessment and medical/mental health treatment of the children in the system
5) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's failure to place children with relatives prior to placing children in foster homes
6) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions to abuse their authority within the NH judicial. legal, healthcare, medical and school system (this includes and is not limited to: stalling court ordered testing of a child in NH DCYF custody, stalling homestudies, stalling homestudy results and incomplete home studies in order to keep a child in NH DCYF custody, gaining further power via abusing exparte hearings to make false allegations against a parent/family of a child taken into NH DCYF custody, abusing their authority to access medical and healthcare records of a child (or of the child's family) prior to being taken into NH DCYF custody, NH DCYF caseworkers influencing healthcare and medical professionals in order to obtain a slanted 2nd opinion or what should have been a neutral professional opinion, NH DCYF abusing their power to cover up a child's special needs in order to create a false picture that the child is making progress while in NH DCYF custody when in fact the child is not making progress, delaying the child's IEP testing, etc ) and medicating foster children with psychiatric medication for violent behavior, without the parents consent. Behavior the child never experienced until taken from his/her family.
6A) an indepth investigation as to actions and influence of NH DYCF regarding the result/finding of homestudies and the decision/denial of homestudy appeals filed by families to the Administrative Appeals Unit
7) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions that failed to follow court orders. IE: court ordered visitation, acting within the timeframes as required by law for any and all actions and decisions regarding children in the system as well as the families of those children
8) an in-depth investigation to study allegations made by NH DCYF's staff to schools, medical professionals, health care professionals, relatives, etc about parents/families of children in NH DCYF custody
9) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's falsifying any type of document and withholding evidence that might be a contradiction of such NH DCYF false allegations and might clear the parent/family of the false allegations made by NH DCYF: This includes and is not limited to: falsifying information on birth certificates in order to promote adoption of a child in NH DCYF custody, false statements and manipulation of facts in order to take a child into NH DCYF custody, false statements in order to obtain social security monies, false statements in order to gain further federal or state monies and false statements to Judges without proof of allegations in order to remove a child from their parents.
10) an in-depth investigation to study how monies were obtained by NH DCYF from the families of the children in protective custody and an audit to the penny of all monies spent by NH DCYF/NH DHHS
11) an in-depth investigation to study the extent of NH DCYF's "double billing" to gain additional funding from the Government, from the State and from families of children in NH DCYF custody
12) an in-depth investigation for a complete audit that will include how every penny of foster care monies was spent on each child in NH DCYF custody
13) an in-depth investigation for determination of financial damages caused by NH
DCYF to the families of those children taken fraudalently by NH DCYF
14) an in-depth investigation for determination of physical, social, psychological, emotional damages caused to the children and to the families of children in NH DCYF custody
15) an in-depth investigation for determination of the extent that NH DCYF has alienated children from their families, including the extent that NH DCYF has alienated the parent from the child in NH DCYF custody
16) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions as abuse and neglect of children in NH DCYF's custody (IE: as those children were and are entitled to freedom to practice the same religion that they practiced prior to being taken into NH DCYF custody, children who were not considered to be placed with relatives instead of being placed into foster care, children who were denied the right to prompt IEP testing within the allotted timeframe from the moment that IEP testing was requested of NH DCYF in writing by the guardian or parent of the child in NH DCYF custody, prompt and proper evaluation and treatment of mental, physical and psychiatric illness of the children in NH DCYF custody, and an indepth review of the medications that were given to the children in NH DCYF custody with a full explanation as to the reason for each medication given, the right of the child to spend time with their family, the social and emotional and physical trauma or injury caused to the child as a direct result of the child being taken into NH DCYF custody: this includes and is not limited to: children placed in foster care or in other settings, any bruises, open skin areas, broken bones, fall/accidents, hospitalizations, broken teeth, signs/symptoms of anxiety or depression including suicide attempts of each and every child during the time that the child is in NH DCYF custody)
17) an indepth investigation to determine if NH DCYF has acted on behalf or in violation of our constitution
18) an indepth look at NH DCYF's actions to determine whether NH DCYF has followed or violated their own mission statement: including determination of how NH DCYF has "reunified families" in a timely manner and in the least traumatic way for the children, youth and families that they are supposed to be servicing
18A) an indepth investigation as to how many families have been reunified by NH DCYF within the last five years
18B) an indepth investigation as to how many parent's rights were terminated in NH within a five year period and how many TPR's(termination of parental rights) were filed by NH DCYF within that five year period
18C) an indepth investigation to determine if NH DCYF has violated federal law via the manner in which NH DCYF takes children into the system, via the manner in which NH DCYF gains further legal power through the use of exparte hearings, via tampering with documents, via falsifying documents, illegally gaining access to information such as medical and health information without full consent and full knowledge of the child's parent/guardian during the time that NH DCYF doesn't have full custody, via stalling documents and testing in order to stall for time within the legal system in order to keep a child in NH DCYF custody
19) an in-depth investigation to study NH DCYF's actions to determine what extent NH DCYF has acted outside of the scope of their usual practice or their Administrative Rules (IE: slandering any families of children in the system, practicing medicine without a license, stalking families, delaying testing/evaluations of the children in NH DCYF custody, tampering/manipulating evidence and truths in order to obtain physical custody of a child, denial of family homestudies of children in NH DCYF custody in order to keep the child in foster care instead of relative placement, tampering with birth certificates as a means to adopt a child to different family, terminating parental rights without just cause, denying families their parental rights when the parental rights have not been terminated, dating family members/having romantic relationships with families of children in the system, and forceful separations of married couples, and other unethical and inappropriate behaviors
20) an indepth investigation as to financial costs to the people of NH for each NH DCYF allegation (which includes and is not limited to, court costs, transportation costs) and to the financial gains that NH DCYF/NH DHHS makes for each child that they take into NH DCYF custody.
21) An indepth investigation of DCYF files showing services given to at-risk families before the removal of a child
21A) What pertains to imminent danger and how many children have been removed from their families in the last five years for anticipated "Neglect in the Future"
22) an indepth investigation as to the amount of federal money being paid to DCYF for the removal for each child compared to the amount of money paid for each family kept together
And request that there be specific requirements for NH DCYF caseworkers and staff who directly work with children in NH DCYF custody and their families (to include parent aids) as there are for doctors, nurses, health aids.
These specific requirements are to include a professional conduct code for each level of staff, specific levels of education for each level of staff (including ongoing training to work with children youth and families), professional licensure codes and professional and licensure accountability of biased or falsified information for all NH DCYF staff and all NH DCYF subcontracted staff who have direct or indirect contact/work with the children in NH DCYF custody or their families (this would include parent aids also).
Request that NH DCYF be made to correct their wrongdoings, return children promptly to the family as soon as there is evidence that contradicts the allegations made by NH DCYF staff, that NH DCYF be required to financially compensate each child/youth/family whom NH DCYF has traumatized, injured, abused, neglected, slandered. NH DCYF must be required to compensate each parent for the loss of job, loss of home, all physical and emotional insults and injuries caused by NH DCYF staff for practicing outside of the scope of their practice, for obtaining privately protected health and medical information without the consent of the child's parent/guardian, for each false statement made about a family member, for each failure to keep the child in safe environment that is most appropriate for the child's needs, financial compensation for failure to ensure that a child in NH DCYF custody be allowed their Constitutional rights, financial compensation for failure to promptly assess, and ensure appropriate diagnosis and treatment of a child in NH DCYF custody.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/nh-families-request-audit-of-nh-dhhsdcyfnh-dcyf
Mother charged in abduction of daughter that led to Amber Alert-What's she guilty of, loving her child?
Published: June 2, 2010
Updated: June 3, 2010 10:00 a.m.
Mother charged in abduction of daughter that led to Amber Alert
By LARRY WELBORN
(Is this the only way our Government will put a stop to the Legal Kidnapping of Our Children by the great and powerful CPS/DCYF?)
THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER
Story Highlights
Huntington Beach woman faces a possible eight-year prison term if convicted of taking her daughter during a supervised visit with a foster father.
SANTA ANA – A Huntington Beach mother pleaded not guilty Wednesday to felony child-stealing, accused of abducting her 4-year-old daughter last week during a supervised visit with the child and her foster father.
Angela Marie Aiton, 34, Huntington Beach, faces a maximum sentence of eight years in prison if convicted. She is also charged with a sentencing enhancement for a 2005 conviction for residential burglary. She remains in custody in lieu of $125,000 bail.
Angela Aiton booking photo
COURTESY OF ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
ADVERTISEMENT
More from Huntington Beach
25 women receive college scholarships
54 minutes ago
City asks state for $90K to cover storm expenses
2 hours & 12 minutes ago
2 men held on attempted murder after fight
2 hours & 8 minutes ago
Surf City could make $624,000 by annexing Sunset Beach
37 minutes ago
Huntington crime: Teacher, tiny woman fighting in parking lot
Superior Court Judge Stephanie George scheduled a preliminary hearing for Aiton on June 11 in the Harbor Justice Center.
Aiton lost custody of her daughter in March and the girl was placed in protective custody and sent to live with foster parents, according to a news release from the Orange County District Attorney's office.
Prosecutors contend that Aiton abducted her daughter and drove away in her black Jeep Grand Cherokee during a supervised visit Friday at The Cheesecake Factory at Fashion Island in Newport Beach.
The girl's foster father called Newport Beach Police about 10 minutes later when he realized Aiton did not return from a trip to the restroom, prompting an Amber Alert, prosecutors said.
Aiton was arrested by Los Angeles police on Saturday when a witness called 911 after seeing the Grand Cherokee traveling south on I-405 at Imperial Highway. The 4-year-old girl was recovered safely.
Deputy District Attorney Jim Bacin said his office also obtained a protective order barring Aiton from contacting her daughter.
Contact the writer: lwelborn@ocregister.com or 714-834-3784
http://www.ocregister.com/news/aiton-251557-daughter-beach.html?cb=1275584465
Comments:
unhappygrammy wrote:
Considering the huge number of children being stolen by CPS due to false allegations, I'm surprised more parents aren't stealing their kids back.
Maybe if more parent's start rebelling and taking their kids back, our Government will finally do something to stop the CPS Gestapo tactics destroying innocent families. It's one thing if the child is really being abused, but to steal non-abused, non-neglected children for their own financial gain is BULL! As for this mother, she was more than likely railroaded just like 99% of all the other parent's who were falsely accused. Our children are NOT For Sale!
6/3/2010 10:11 AM PDT
Recommend
Report Abuse
Permalink
upyoursbaby wrote:
Leonard H. Don't get me started about Manifest Destiny. puuhhhleeeze. I don't care WHAT organization you founded or represent. New World (America for those of you who don't know) "civilization" was created...Tell the truth Leonard H. Give me a break. Drop the emotional argument and get down to the FACTS MISTER!
6/3/2010 10:02 AM PDT
Recommend
Report Abuse
Permalink
upyoursbaby wrote:
Leonard H. Don't get me started about Manifest Destiny. puuhhhleeeze. I don't care WHAT organization you founded or represent. New World (America for those of you who don't know) "civilization" was created...Tell the truth Leonard H. Give me a break. Drop the emotional argument and get down to the FACTS MISTER!
6/3/2010 10:02 AM PDT
Recommend
Report Abuse
Permalink
glenda90621 wrote:
When lip injections go wrong . . .
6/3/2010 8:50 AM PDT
Recommend
Report Abuse
Permalink
leonardh wrote:
I don't know what the real story was that caused the government to kidnap this woman's child. It looks like the consensus is that she did dope. Not that consensus has any value or truth.
But the pompous judgmentalism in these comments is sickening.
Especially the comments about the MUG SHOT. Does anybody know what people go through before a MUG SHOT is taken? Do you think the cops even gave her a tissue to wipe the tears between sobs? Have you ever seen a MUG SHOT of somebody looking "gorgeous"? A MUG SHOT is a picture of a person at possibly the worst moment in their entire life.
And, oh the smugness about a stupid MOTHER taking back her kidnapped child!
It doesn't matter how smart or stupid a MOTHER is, there is the MOTHER'S INSTINCT to protect her young. If you do not understand MATERNAL INSTINCT, please spend some time watching "Animal Planet". A lot of these "maternal units" will fight to the DEATH to protect their young. Not very smart, eh?
When I see the sort of comments made on newspaper stories like this, I am aghast and terrified at the utter ignorance of American Due Process.
As I said, I don't know any of the particulars of this story.
But the tenor of the comments are truly scary- Whatever the bureaucracy says is gospel, and people are ready to do a lynching.
Most of you would have gotten along fine in Germany in the 1930's.
Leonard Henderson, co-founder
American Family Rights Association
http://familyrights.us
"Until Every Child Comes Home" ©
"The Voice of America's Families" ©
6/3/2010 8:45 AM PDT
Recommend (2)
Report Abuse
Permalink
surfcityred wrote:
OK, so Angela is not too bright and attempted to steal her own child back. The social worker must be a Mensa member too. I would love to see their photo posted. The social worker's only task was to protect the baby and they failed. Fire their a$$. Angela has some problems and perhaps a little time in the cooler will help her find the path back to reality. It is sad that the children are always the ones who suffer the most. The child services dolt needs to find a different job. Our tax dollars support these losers.
6/3/2010 7:32 AM PDT
Recommend (2)
Report Abuse
Permalink
demandnoamnesty wrote:
she looks like a fine example of pure trash
6/3/2010 7:04 AM PDT
Recommend
Report Abuse
Permalink
hbmikey wrote:
Hey she looks great !
6/3/2010 5:52 AM PDT
Recommend
Report Abuse
Permalink
changethesystem wrote:
It's really disgusting to see how superficial, judgmental and mean people can be. You know who you are: You're the real criminals. Maybe you should all take a look at your DMV photos before you criticize someone who was arrested and is facing charges and had to spend hours in a cold cell after being searched and subjected to ill-treatment by the police, before her picture was taken. And what does her looks matter anyway? As to meth. well aren't we being a little judgmental here? Seriously some of you people are obviously the kind of ghouls who slow down traffic to gawk at a car accident in the hopes of seeing blood and gore. No wonder this country is backwards, and no wonder the "System" hasn't changed yet and will, because of the apparent ignorance of so many Americans, continue to take on more victims like this woman and her child. Try a giving someone a break, or show a little sympathy, or at least acknowledge that under the Constitution all citizens are innocent until found guilty. To those who gawk and sneer, you'd better hope you're not the next person to be judged.
Updated: June 3, 2010 10:00 a.m.
Mother charged in abduction of daughter that led to Amber Alert
By LARRY WELBORN
(Is this the only way our Government will put a stop to the Legal Kidnapping of Our Children by the great and powerful CPS/DCYF?)
THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER
Story Highlights
Huntington Beach woman faces a possible eight-year prison term if convicted of taking her daughter during a supervised visit with a foster father.
SANTA ANA – A Huntington Beach mother pleaded not guilty Wednesday to felony child-stealing, accused of abducting her 4-year-old daughter last week during a supervised visit with the child and her foster father.
Angela Marie Aiton, 34, Huntington Beach, faces a maximum sentence of eight years in prison if convicted. She is also charged with a sentencing enhancement for a 2005 conviction for residential burglary. She remains in custody in lieu of $125,000 bail.
Angela Aiton booking photo
COURTESY OF ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
ADVERTISEMENT
More from Huntington Beach
25 women receive college scholarships
54 minutes ago
City asks state for $90K to cover storm expenses
2 hours & 12 minutes ago
2 men held on attempted murder after fight
2 hours & 8 minutes ago
Surf City could make $624,000 by annexing Sunset Beach
37 minutes ago
Huntington crime: Teacher, tiny woman fighting in parking lot
Superior Court Judge Stephanie George scheduled a preliminary hearing for Aiton on June 11 in the Harbor Justice Center.
Aiton lost custody of her daughter in March and the girl was placed in protective custody and sent to live with foster parents, according to a news release from the Orange County District Attorney's office.
Prosecutors contend that Aiton abducted her daughter and drove away in her black Jeep Grand Cherokee during a supervised visit Friday at The Cheesecake Factory at Fashion Island in Newport Beach.
The girl's foster father called Newport Beach Police about 10 minutes later when he realized Aiton did not return from a trip to the restroom, prompting an Amber Alert, prosecutors said.
Aiton was arrested by Los Angeles police on Saturday when a witness called 911 after seeing the Grand Cherokee traveling south on I-405 at Imperial Highway. The 4-year-old girl was recovered safely.
Deputy District Attorney Jim Bacin said his office also obtained a protective order barring Aiton from contacting her daughter.
Contact the writer: lwelborn@ocregister.com or 714-834-3784
http://www.ocregister.com/news/aiton-251557-daughter-beach.html?cb=1275584465
Comments:
unhappygrammy wrote:
Considering the huge number of children being stolen by CPS due to false allegations, I'm surprised more parents aren't stealing their kids back.
Maybe if more parent's start rebelling and taking their kids back, our Government will finally do something to stop the CPS Gestapo tactics destroying innocent families. It's one thing if the child is really being abused, but to steal non-abused, non-neglected children for their own financial gain is BULL! As for this mother, she was more than likely railroaded just like 99% of all the other parent's who were falsely accused. Our children are NOT For Sale!
6/3/2010 10:11 AM PDT
Recommend
Report Abuse
Permalink
upyoursbaby wrote:
Leonard H. Don't get me started about Manifest Destiny. puuhhhleeeze. I don't care WHAT organization you founded or represent. New World (America for those of you who don't know) "civilization" was created...Tell the truth Leonard H. Give me a break. Drop the emotional argument and get down to the FACTS MISTER!
6/3/2010 10:02 AM PDT
Recommend
Report Abuse
Permalink
upyoursbaby wrote:
Leonard H. Don't get me started about Manifest Destiny. puuhhhleeeze. I don't care WHAT organization you founded or represent. New World (America for those of you who don't know) "civilization" was created...Tell the truth Leonard H. Give me a break. Drop the emotional argument and get down to the FACTS MISTER!
6/3/2010 10:02 AM PDT
Recommend
Report Abuse
Permalink
glenda90621 wrote:
When lip injections go wrong . . .
6/3/2010 8:50 AM PDT
Recommend
Report Abuse
Permalink
leonardh wrote:
I don't know what the real story was that caused the government to kidnap this woman's child. It looks like the consensus is that she did dope. Not that consensus has any value or truth.
But the pompous judgmentalism in these comments is sickening.
Especially the comments about the MUG SHOT. Does anybody know what people go through before a MUG SHOT is taken? Do you think the cops even gave her a tissue to wipe the tears between sobs? Have you ever seen a MUG SHOT of somebody looking "gorgeous"? A MUG SHOT is a picture of a person at possibly the worst moment in their entire life.
And, oh the smugness about a stupid MOTHER taking back her kidnapped child!
It doesn't matter how smart or stupid a MOTHER is, there is the MOTHER'S INSTINCT to protect her young. If you do not understand MATERNAL INSTINCT, please spend some time watching "Animal Planet". A lot of these "maternal units" will fight to the DEATH to protect their young. Not very smart, eh?
When I see the sort of comments made on newspaper stories like this, I am aghast and terrified at the utter ignorance of American Due Process.
As I said, I don't know any of the particulars of this story.
But the tenor of the comments are truly scary- Whatever the bureaucracy says is gospel, and people are ready to do a lynching.
Most of you would have gotten along fine in Germany in the 1930's.
Leonard Henderson, co-founder
American Family Rights Association
http://familyrights.us
"Until Every Child Comes Home" ©
"The Voice of America's Families" ©
6/3/2010 8:45 AM PDT
Recommend (2)
Report Abuse
Permalink
surfcityred wrote:
OK, so Angela is not too bright and attempted to steal her own child back. The social worker must be a Mensa member too. I would love to see their photo posted. The social worker's only task was to protect the baby and they failed. Fire their a$$. Angela has some problems and perhaps a little time in the cooler will help her find the path back to reality. It is sad that the children are always the ones who suffer the most. The child services dolt needs to find a different job. Our tax dollars support these losers.
6/3/2010 7:32 AM PDT
Recommend (2)
Report Abuse
Permalink
demandnoamnesty wrote:
she looks like a fine example of pure trash
6/3/2010 7:04 AM PDT
Recommend
Report Abuse
Permalink
hbmikey wrote:
Hey she looks great !
6/3/2010 5:52 AM PDT
Recommend
Report Abuse
Permalink
changethesystem wrote:
It's really disgusting to see how superficial, judgmental and mean people can be. You know who you are: You're the real criminals. Maybe you should all take a look at your DMV photos before you criticize someone who was arrested and is facing charges and had to spend hours in a cold cell after being searched and subjected to ill-treatment by the police, before her picture was taken. And what does her looks matter anyway? As to meth. well aren't we being a little judgmental here? Seriously some of you people are obviously the kind of ghouls who slow down traffic to gawk at a car accident in the hopes of seeing blood and gore. No wonder this country is backwards, and no wonder the "System" hasn't changed yet and will, because of the apparent ignorance of so many Americans, continue to take on more victims like this woman and her child. Try a giving someone a break, or show a little sympathy, or at least acknowledge that under the Constitution all citizens are innocent until found guilty. To those who gawk and sneer, you'd better hope you're not the next person to be judged.
ISSUE PAPERS on Family Preservation, Foster Care and Reasonable Efforts
http://nccpr.info/issue-papers/
ISSUE PAPERS on Family Preservation, Foster Care and Reasonable Efforts
Introduction
1. Foster Care vs. Family Preservation: The Track Record on Safety
2. Foster Care Panics
3. They Erred on the Side of the Child Case Histories
4. Emotional Abuse
5. Who is in The System?
6. Child Abuse and Poverty
7. Child Welfare and Race
8. The Real Reasons for Child Abuse Deaths
9. The Unreasonable Assault on Reasonable Efforts
10. What is Family Preservation?
11. Does Family Preservation Work?
12. Financial Incentives
13. Family Preservation and Substance Abuse
14. Family Preservation and Adoption
15. Just Say No to the Orphanage
ISSUE PAPERS on Family Preservation, Foster Care and Reasonable Efforts
Introduction
1. Foster Care vs. Family Preservation: The Track Record on Safety
2. Foster Care Panics
3. They Erred on the Side of the Child Case Histories
4. Emotional Abuse
5. Who is in The System?
6. Child Abuse and Poverty
7. Child Welfare and Race
8. The Real Reasons for Child Abuse Deaths
9. The Unreasonable Assault on Reasonable Efforts
10. What is Family Preservation?
11. Does Family Preservation Work?
12. Financial Incentives
13. Family Preservation and Substance Abuse
14. Family Preservation and Adoption
15. Just Say No to the Orphanage
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)