Lawyers: Privacy shields DCYF in sex abuse case

Lawyers: Privacy shields DCYF in sex abuse case | New Hampshire:
CONCORD — Attorneys representing the adoptive parents of two children who were victims in a highly publicized Claremont sexual abuse case argued before the state Supreme Court that a lawsuit they plan to file should be filed in public court, to shed light on the way the case was handled by child protection agencies.

My comment: I agree the children's names should be redacted, but Atty. Capace is right. The secrecy in Family Court IS most definitely a shield to protect DCYF and CASA AND Family Court Judges.As I was once told by a Former DCYF worker, "DCYF can do whatever they want, because our Government gave them the power to do so." There is no transparency or accountability within DCYF and Family Court. No checks and balances. Anything goes. People would be shocked if they knew what really goes on behind the doors of the "Secret" Courts.It's way past time to "Open" the NH "Secret" Family Court's. Maybe under watchful eyes Government mandates will be followed and innocent families won't be railroaded. Maybe then only the truly abused children will be "Saved" and the unabused children will be left with their INNOCENT families.Why should anyone do the jobs they're paid to do when they aren't held accountable for their negligence?