Twin, 9 year old boy's, left alone for month's to fend for themselves by a "supposed" babysitter and the parent's aren't charged by DCYF or the Court's, yet a Mother who leaves her son with a babysitter for a few HOURS , has her child stolen by NH DCYF and never returned after the babysitter leaves him home alone sleeping.
See: http://www.unionleader.com/article/20150123/NEWS03/150129565
The Mother is charged with child endangerment, the charges are dropped in Criminal Court, but the Judge refuses to drop charges in Family Court and won't allow new found evidence proving the Mother's innocence. Shouldn't she have gotten her son back? She didn't and relatives weren't even allowed custody. Her son was ILLEGALLY adopted, never to be seen again. So what gives DCYF and the Family Court's the right to pick and choose whose kids are returned? Why is does one family get better treatment than another? Where's the equality? What's good for one SHOULD be good for the other!
The parent's of the twin boy's are not facing charges, so why was the Mother of the little boy charged? She had a babysitter also and her child wasn't left alone for months.
How can DCYF and the Family Court's get away with playing Favorites?
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
No comments:
Post a Comment