6/12 /2012
By: Kevin Avard
Founded with Recommendation
The house Committee of redress of grievances , having received the testimony and documents, and having received no response from any of the involved officials or their representatives concludes that the Brentwood family court wrongfully allowed a motion for “pre-contempt” which is a nonexistent abuse; That Marital Master Pam Kelly held a hearing without providing a 10 day notice,and that the Brentwood family court also failed to provide statutory notice of a hearing regard to the petitioner.It also found that (GAL) guardian ad litem Attorney Lynn Abbey,did not disclose and intentionally misrepresented her relationship to the father of the petitioner’s children and was uncorrected by the court when challenged and that the (PCC) professional conducts committee failed to hold GAL Lynn Abbey accountable for such ethics violations when informed.furthermore the Committee found Master Luneau failed to hold Lynn Abbey accountable for perjury when she misrepresented that she was unaware of the conflict of interest. Finally, the committee find the (JCC) judicial Conduct Committee failed to oversee lawbreaking by a judge leaving no one for the alleged victim to turn to but the house and the redress and/or Impeachment process.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Amend the laws of the State so that permitting perjury in judicial proceedings shall be recognized as official oppression by the judge and so that individuals can be held criminally liable for not recusing themselves from matter before the court when there are conflicts of interest that may materially affect the outcome.
If the Democrats see absolutely nothing wrong with DCYF and the family courts, why don't they serve on another committee? They've deemed ALL of the petitioners to not have legitimate complaints against these bodies of government? Please. What happened to serving the people?
ReplyDelete