Saturday, August 28, 2010

Child deaths and Child Protective Services

Child deaths and Child Protective Services
August 4th, 2010 8:45 am ET

It is only through mass outrage by citizens that the abuse of children by our present Child Protective Service (CPS) will stop.

When a well packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over
generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.
by……..Dresden James

The courts rubber stamp CPS accusations and children are removed from their parents. However, in some cases children are not removed. There are several reasons why either takes place.


Recently, in Kent County there have been two child deaths at the hands of CPS.


Two year old Rozlynn Martinez was murdered by her mother's boyfriend in February, 2010. Her body placed into a commercial dumpster and perhaps the county incinerator. This precious child should have been removed from her mother's home. By all accounts, her Mother loved her and suspected she might be being abused by the boyfriend, an abusive convicted felon. CPS was monitoring the case and saw that perhaps the mother was too involved with the boyfriend, since he was also the father of her second child.


Another precious five year old, Emily Meno and her twin sister were removed from their mother and placed into a foster home of a single person. The two girls had frequent seizures and were considered disabled. By all accounts, this first time foster mother was over-whelmed with the responsibility of the girls and out of frustration killed Emily in July, 2010.


Another precious five year old was removed from her mother. Her grandmother lived with the family from birth and cared for the child until she was ordered removed by the court and placed into Foster care.


Let us examine the rational of CPS on these cases. Rozlynn should have been removed from her home until the abusive felon boyfriend was no longer in the home. Perhaps, the CPS caseworker had no foster home that would take Rozlynn . Perhaps, the caseworker was just not paying close enough attention to a child of Hispanic heritage.


Emily, was placed into a foster home where the caseworker was not paying close attention to the needs of the children and the foster mother. Emily should never have been placed into a one person caregiver home where there had been no previous experience with disabled children. However, CPS receives the highest of federal funding for removing disabled children.


The child removed from her grandmother's loving care was not done so because of abuse or neglect. It was stated in court that "she is a wonderful child". She had a good home, she was loved and she was happy. Then, why take her? Because, she would sell well in the adoption market and had already been promised to an adoptive family.


The Department of Human Service has told the Michigan Legislature, that Michigan terminates the rights of more parents than any other state. Is it possible that most of the nation's bad parents live in Michigan? Is it possible that it is needed revenue by the state instead?


Children are removed or not removed because they sell well or do not sell well in the adoption market. The federal funding paid yearly to the states is billions of dollars from Social Security Title IV E. This is revenue the state cannot afford to lose. Therefore, states are actually trafficking in children.

It is your social security funds used for child removal from families. CPS in this nation is a business, it makes money. There are federal quotas for children placed into adoption. States must meet these quotas in order to keep the federal funding coming. Children are bought and sold into adoption slavery for the funding! It happens hundreds of times every day in this nation.


If this is not enough to strike fear in the parents of this nation, then what is? Get involved with an organization to stop this abuse of children by Child Protective Service. www.citizensforparentalrights.org

http://www.examiner.com/family-court-in-grand-rapids/child-deaths-and-child-protective-service

No comments:

Post a Comment